Tsuna's Blog: Hardware Growler For Mac
. In FY1 1, the N avy conducted Software Q ualication Testing (SQT) of System Conguration Set (SCS) H6E for F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler aircraft, SQT of SCS 23X for early-model F/A-18E/F aircraft, and a second FOT&E period for the APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar. DOT&E issued individu al classied reports on this testing for both F/A-18E/F and EA-18G in FY12.
The APG-79 AESA radar provides improved performan ce relative to the legacy APG-73 radar; however, operational testing did not demonstrate a statistically signicant difference in mission accomplishment between F/A-18E/F aircraft equipped with AESA a nd those equipped with the legacy radar. While S CSs H6E and 23X demonstrate acceptable suitability, the AESA radar’s reliability continues to suffer from software instability. The radar’s failure to meet reliability requirements and poor built-in test (BIT) performance rem ain as shortfall s from previous test and evaluation periods. Overall, the F/A -18E/F Super H ornet weapon system is operationally effective and suitable for most threat environments.
However, the platform is not operat ionally effective for use in certain threat environments, the specics of which are addressed in the DOT&E FY12 classied report. The EA -18G Gro wler weap on system is operat ionally effective and operationally suitable. The Navy is conducting F/A-18E/F and EA-18G SCS H8E SQT i n two phases. Phase I operational tes ting commenced in 4QFY12 and is scheduled to complete in 1QFY13. The Navy expects to conduct P hase II testing during 2Q – 3QFY13.
Tsuna's Blog: Hardware Growler For Mac Pro
DOT&E wil l issue a single report covering both H8E phases after the completion of Phase II in 4QFY13. DOT&E re ported on APG-79 radar IOT&E in FY07, assessi ng it as not operationally effective or suitable due to signicant deciencies in tactical performance, reliability, and BIT functionality. The Navy conducted APG-79 ra dar FOT& E in FY 09 in conjunct ion with SCS H4E SQT. The Navy’s Commander, Operational T est and Evaluation Force subsequently reported that signicant deciencies remained for both APG-79 AE SA performance and suitability; D OT&E concurre d with this assessment.
Concurren t with SQT for SCSs H6E and 23X, the Navy conducted a second APG-79 radar FOT&E period in FY11. The Navy conducted the testing in accordance with the DOT&E-approved Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) and test plan. DOT&E issue d a classied report on this t esting in FY12; nding that the Super Hornet made incremental improvements, but still retained important deciencies.
The Navy is conducting F/A-18E/F and EA-18G SCS H8E SQT i n two phases. Phase I operational tes ting was originally scheduled for 1QFY12, but due to multiple software anomalies during developmental testing, the Navy postponed the Operational T est Readiness Review until 3QFY12. H8E Phase I operational testing commenced in 4QFY12 and is scheduled to complete in 1Q FY13. The Navy is conducting the testing in accordance with the DOT&E-approved TEMP and test plan.
Tsuna's Blog Hardwere Growler For Mac
The Navy expects to conduct H8E Phase II operational te sting during 2Q – 3QFY13. SCS H8E test ing does not include an end-to-end multi-AIM-120 m issile shot. This capability is a N avy operational requirement not previously demonstrated or successfully tested. The Navy tentativel y plans to conduct a multi-missile shot in conjunction with SCS H12E testing. The APG-79 AESA radar demonstrated marginal improvements since the previous FOT&E period and provides improved performance relative to the legacy APG -73 radar. However, operational testing does not demonstrate a statistically signicant difference in mission accomplishment between F/A- 18E/F aircraf t equipped with AESA and those equipped with the legacy radar. Full development of AESA electronic war fare capability remains deferred to later software builds.
While SCS s H6E a nd 23X demo nstrate accepta ble suitabili ty, the AESA radar’s reliability continues to suffer from software instability despite s oftware upgrades. The radar’s fai lure to meet reliability requirements and poor BIT performance remain as shortfalls from previous test and evaluation periods. Overall, the F/A -18E/F Super Hor net weapon system is operationally effective and suitable for most threat environments. However, the platform is not oper ationally effective for use in certain threat environments, the details of which are addressed in DOT&E’ s classied report.
The EA -18G Grow ler weapon s system is operat ionally effective and operationally suitable. DOT&E w ill report on Super Hornet and Growler S CS H8E capability improvements after both Phase I and II operational testing are complete in 4QFY13.